Hypotheses of
Alzheimer's Disease
The Neuroplasticity Theory of Alzheimer's
Disease
The most fundamental statement about Alzheimer pathology is
that it attacks neuroplastic processes. At all system
levels of function (biological,
psychological, social), it is the capacity to store new
information that is affected by Alzheimer's disease.
Tracing memory mechanisms to their most basic levels leads to
the loci at which Alzheimer pathology affects brain
mechanisms. This hypothesis was first proposed in 1985
( Ashford
& Jarvik; see Ashford,
Mattson, Kumar, 1998; Teter &
Ashford, 2002 for full discussion). This
hypothesis has recently been rediscovered, eloquently
restated, and expanded by others (see
Mesulam and Arendt,
2001). This hypothesis has been supported by repeated
findings that pathological mechanisms associated with
Alzheimer's disease invariably end up being related to
learning mechanisms (e.g., acetylcholine, norepinephrine,
serotonin pathways, NMDA receptors, synapse counts, tau
phosphorylation, Amyloid PreProtein, cerebral cholesterol
metabolism; see Ashford,
Mattson, Kumar, 1998).
The neuroplasticity hypothesis also pulls together the tau
and amyloid hypotheses with the corollary hypothesis that
there are two fundamental cellular memory mechanisms, each
attacked by one of two types of pathology, the first by
the amyloid (more closely linked to causation, affecting more
diffuse cortical regions including the temporal and parietal
lobes), resulting in senile plaques, then, once a critical
point is reached, the second by tau hyperphosphorylation,
which leads to the neurofibrillary pathology (correlated with
dementia severity, initially affecting the hippocampus and
medial temporal lobe). In each case, if the delicate
balance between forming new connections and removing
connections no longer required is disrupted, Alzheimer
pathology may develop. Amyloid PreProtein processing
tips away from an alpha-secretase/beta-secretase balance, to
produce excess beta-amyloid and resultant free-radicals.
Tau is excessively phosphorylated to the point that it forms
neurofilaments, and then neurofibrillary tangles. The
neurofilaments appear to clog dendrite segments (Ashford
et al., 1998), which leads to amputation of the distal
portions of dendritic trees, large scale losses of synapses,
and the increase of CSF tau. These late changes
correspond with the dementia severity associated with
Alzheimer's disease (see
Ashford & Schmitt, 2001 for a discussion of modeling of
dementia severity).
A central factor in Alzheimer's disease is ApolipoProteinE,
which is produced by glial cells and accounts for at least 50%
of the Alzheimer's disease that occurs between 60 - 80 years
of age. APOE plays a central role in cerebral
cholesterol transport. Recent evidence has shown that
cholesterol metabolism is involved in neuroplasticity.
Epidemiological studies are now implicating cholesterol
metabolism in Alzheimer causation. This chain of
causation provides yet another buttress to support the
neuroplasticity hypothesis of AD. Additional evidence
suggests that cholesterol is involved in Amyloid PreProtein
processing, thus linking the APOE alleles to amyloid
production, thought to be central to AD causation, and further
supporting the role of this mechanism in neuroplasticity and
the general neuroplasticity theory of AD.
See:
Ashford JW,
Mortimer JA. Non-familial Alzheimer's disease is mainly due to
genetic factors. J Alzheimers Dis. 2002
Jun;4(3):169-77.
and
Raber J,
Huang, Y, Ashford JW, ApoE genotype accounts for the vast
majority of AD risk and AD neuropathology. Neurobiology of
Aging 2004.
and
Ashford JW.
APOE genotype effects on Alzheime's disease onset and
epidemiology. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 23:155-163,
2004.
Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that acetylcholine,
a fundamental neurotransmitter in neuroplasticity, inhibits
both senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle formation (see figure adapted
from Fisher, 2000). This hypothesis suggests that
drugs which increase acetylcholine function, such as
cholinesterase inhibitors, may slow or stop Alzheimer
progression.
Ashford,
J.W. and Jarvik, K.L. Alzheimer's disease: does neuron
plasticity predispose to axonal neurofibrillary degeneration?
New England Journal of Medicine. 5:388-389, 1985.
Ashford,
J.W., Mattson, M., Kumar, V. Neurobiological Systems Disrupted
by Alzheimer's Disease and Molecular Biological Theories of
Vulnerability. In: Kumar, V. and Eisdorfer, C. (Eds.) Advances
in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
Springer Publishing Company: New York, 1998.
Ashford
JW, Soultanian NS, Zhang SX, Geddes JW. Neuropil threads
are collinear with MAP2 immunostaining in neuronal dendrites
of Alzheimer brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57:972-8,
1998.
Ashford,
JW, Schmitt, FA. Modeling the time-course of alzheimer
dementia. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 3:20-8, 2001.
Debates on Alzheimer Theories: Cincinnati, July, 2001
- conference
summary, -- review by
Ashford
- (see also summary
of debate position by Ashford and Mortimer, in press, part of
the conference)
MOST RECENT ARTICLE:
Neuroplasticity
in Alzheimer’s Disease Bruce Teter & J W
Ashford, Journal of Neuroscience Research, 2002 (286K,
pdf)
OTHER REFERENCES:
Arendt
T. Alzheimer's disease as a disorder of mechanisms underlying
structural brain self-organization. Neuroscience.
2001;102(4):723-65.
Fisher,
A. Therapeutic strategies in Alzheimer's disease: M1
muscarinic agonists. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2000
Oct;84(2):101-12.
Mesulam
MM. A plasticity-based theory of the pathogenesis of
Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;924:42-52.
ADDENDUM: There is an interesting question about how
the brain stores information. Information appears to be
stored in a massive parallel distributed network. When a
broad neural net is activated, about half of the neurons
become active. When learning occurs, the vector
weightings of the single neuron units in the net can be
conceptualized as storing the new information in a "vector
convolution" operation. When recognition occurs, the
mathematical operation in the network can be considered a
"vector correlation". See Ashford,
Coburn, Fuster, 1998 for a complete discussion and
references. Accordingly, the storage capacity of the
brain is essentially infinite. However, learning is
dependent on the ability of the neurons to be able to
continually form new connections (between axons and dendrites
at synapses). If the dendrites become clogged by excess
stress (particularly during learning events), as seems to
occur in brains affected by Alzheimer's disease (see
Ashford, Soultanian, Zhang, Geddes, 1998), then the
learning is disrupted and memories are slowly destroyed, more
recent ones first, old ones later.